Prince Andrew
Date Range
Score Range
Frames Prince Andrew as a scandal-ridden, isolated figure under legal scrutiny
Uses repeated judgmental language such as 'shamed', 'disgraced', and 'mystery bruise', focuses on unverified allegations and police investigations, and highlights his absence from royal duties without balancing with legal presumption or context.
“The disgraced royal had been walking the late Queen Elizabeth's corgis when he was approached by a balaclava-clad man who allegedly ran towards him.”
framed as excluded from royal legitimacy and moral standing
Repeated use of 'former Prince Andrew' and linkage of housing details to Epstein scandal serve to socially and institutionally exclude him. The narrative frames him as having lost status and privilege through disgrace, not neutral policy change.
“Former Prince Andrew made money subletting cottages on his rent-free estate, report shows”
framed as morally discredited and disgraced
Loaded label 'disgraced' is applied without qualification or balance, introducing a strong negative moral judgment not extended to others.
“Notably – and not unexpectedly – absent will be the disgraced Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson.”
Prince Andrew framed as illegitimate and excluded from royal legitimacy
framing_by_emphasis, loaded_language
“But notably absent is expected to be Andrew himself, amid continuing efforts by the monarchy to distance itself from the scandal surrounding his links to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.”
Prince Andrew is framed as a hostile or tainted figure, separated from the royal institution and family unity
[sensationalism], [loaded_language]: Use of 'snub', 'outcast', and 'avoiding' constructs Andrew as an adversary to the monarch and royal order.
“King Charles has delivered a fresh snub to Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor by avoiding him despite staying only a field away from his brother's new home at Sandringham, the Daily Mail can reveal.”