Meghan Markle
Date Range
Score Range
Meghan is framed as untrustworthy and self-serving, exploiting sensitive moments for media gain
[loaded_language], [narrative_framing], [moral_framing]
“It seemed like a public relations opportunity that was totally inappropriate on such an occasion and unsurprisingly it was heavily criticised at the time”
Meghan Markle is portrayed as excluded from familial bonds and royal acceptance due to her background and ambition
[loaded_adjectives], [scare_quotes], [narrative_framing]
“one steps out with actresses, one doesn't marry them”
Portraying Meghan Markle as untrustworthy and commercially failing
Loaded labels and anonymous sourcing depict her career as 'inconsistent and erratic', with repeated use of terms like 'embattled', 'failed', and 'doomed' undermining credibility.
“the Duchess's brand is 'inconsistent and erratic'”
Meghan Markle framed as hypocritical and self-contradictory
[decontextualised_statistics], [scare_quotes]
“There are no $100 candles on my site - that's so obnoxious,' she said to an audience as she promoted her now-defunct blog.”
Framed as socially isolated from royal family
[loaded_language]
“whilst she might not be on good enough speaking terms to share Afternoon Tea with most of her royal relatives”
Framed as insincere and opportunistic
[editorializing], [sensationalism]
“fans were left questioning the timing of the post”
Meghan Markle is portrayed as untrustworthy and damaging to the institution
The article uses loaded metaphor and anonymous sourcing to suggest her past actions were deeply offensive to the royal family, framing her as a disruptive force.
“Even before her wedding to Prince Harry, the then Meghan Markle set off alarm bells with an act my sources called 'a punch to the solar plexus'.”
Meghan is implicitly framed as corrupt and commercially exploitative
[loaded_language], [outrage_appeal] Though less directly named, Meghan is included in the negative portrayal of the couple’s motives and actions.
“Prince Harry and Meghan quit official duties to seek a fortune across the Atlantic before attacking the Royal Family at every opportunity.”
Meghan Markle portrayed as excluded and negatively contrasted with Kate
Meghan is referred to as 'the Harpy' and implicitly blamed for her own struggles, while Kate is praised for enduring similar treatment—framing Meghan as less capable or deserving of inclusion.
“Putting Prince Harry and the Harpy aside for a moment, there's new reporting that Sarah Ferguson...”
portrayed as dishonest and commercially exploitative
The article accuses Meghan of maintaining a false narrative about her jam brand being homemade, calling her 'the grift that keeps on grifting', directly attacking her integrity and authenticity.
“‘She’s the grift that keeps on grifting,’ wrote one disgruntled online commentator.”