Harry and Meghan
Date Range
Score Range
Harry and Meghan framed as hostile outsiders disrupting the royal family
Conflict framing and narrative repetition depict the couple as deceptive and damaging, using phrases like 'brutal treatment' and 'casting a spell' to position them as antagonists.
“A new book has accused Meghan Markle of “casting a spell” over Prince Harry while still living with her chef ex-boyfriend, adding to a volley of critique against the couple.”
Harry and Meghan are portrayed as socially isolated and excluded by former friends
[loaded_language], [episodic_framing]
“But the star has since seemingly chosen his side in the transatlantic rift between the Duke and the rest of his family.”
portrayed as adversaries who betrayed the monarchy
[moral_framing], [conflict_framing] — Framed as having 'trashed the Monarchy for personal gain' and as having caused a 'rift' through disloyalty, positioning them as antagonists.
“The rift resulted from the way they trashed the Monarchy for personal gain after they stepped down as senior working royals.”
Harry and Meghan framed as untrustworthy, socially rejected, and personally flawed
Promoted content uses highly derogatory language and vague insider claims to portray them as morally and socially bankrupt, with no balance or sourcing.
“'She's the cheapest. No one wants to hang out with her'”
Harry and Meghan's choices portrayed as disruptive and outside royal norms
loaded_language, omission
“However, the greatest scandal surrounding the young royal's birth seemed to relate to his title. Or, indeed, lack thereof.”
Frames Harry and Meghan as adversarial toward the Royal Family
The use of terms like 'notorious exit' and 'antipathy' frames the Sussexes as hostile actors breaking from tradition. The article attributes division to their actions without exploring institutional resistance or prior conflicts.
“the Sussexes' notorious exit from the Firm”